<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>DygiScape - Latest Comments in AOL Settles Suit Regarding Email Footers (Lulz)</title><link>http://dygiscape-blog.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://dygiscape-blog.disqus.com/aol_settles_suit_regarding_email_footers_lulz/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:15:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: AOL Settles Suit Regarding Email Footers (Lulz)</title><link>http://www.joemanna.com/blog/aol-settles-suit-regarding-email-footers-lulz/#comment-20325696</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This should have no impact on signing onto AOL. It's sad to see they still have reliability issues even after millions of users have left the service.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For reference, the Footer Ad is the text-based ad that is inserted automatically into e-mails when they are sent. Not the graphical ad placed below the inbox or when writing email.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;AOL is fading away quickly from mainstream. In the world of email marketing, MSN/Live/Hotmail reigns as #1, Yahoo as #2 and Gmail as #3 ISPs people choose. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joe Manna</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:15:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AOL Settles Suit Regarding Email Footers (Lulz)</title><link>http://www.joemanna.com/blog/aol-settles-suit-regarding-email-footers-lulz/#comment-20325636</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Erik,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As far as I know, you could opt-out of it, but there aren't named individual users in it. (That would be a very lengthy list!)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The lawsuit is frivolous on a few degrees (IMO), but AOL has agreed to settle and enable the Footer Ad to be removed by all users voluntarily.  You don't have to do anything to get that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am not a lawyer, but I wouldn't concern each other with the details of this, because neither of us are the named parties. :) &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joe Manna</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:12:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AOL Settles Suit Regarding Email Footers (Lulz)</title><link>http://www.joemanna.com/blog/aol-settles-suit-regarding-email-footers-lulz/#comment-20325305</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The best part of it, the donation to charity is a great way to reduce their tax footprint and they can deduct all of it, even if court-ordered.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With regard to people being charged $20 month after month for over a year is an issue I have. Not with the company but the people being charged. I'm not trying to defend 'the man', but there's a certain amount of personal responsibility people have in monitoring their finances ensuring they are billed correctly by their creditors.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How could she not know after at least a couple months something's wrong?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Besides, AOL executed a fairly decent "free AOL" campaign ALL users should have been notified of during August 2006. Any time someone changes billing plans, the Free AOL option is a choice that remains regardless of account balances or status. Even on Dial-up, I believe the price is $10/mo.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That said, the credit policies at AOL only afford three months cash credit back to people which is disappointing for people have held service for a year. There's an amount of personal responsibility that we all have in holding companies accountable. Not a year later unless circumstances like death or whatnot took place.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joe Manna</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:08:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AOL Settles Suit Regarding Email Footers (Lulz)</title><link>http://www.joemanna.com/blog/aol-settles-suit-regarding-email-footers-lulz/#comment-20318777</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Brenda,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It appears AOL has re-sent their email about this to all members. I agree, for the size of the company they are, it requires litigation to change their decisions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;~Joe&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joe Manna</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:00:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AOL Settles Suit Regarding Email Footers (Lulz)</title><link>http://www.joemanna.com/blog/aol-settles-suit-regarding-email-footers-lulz/#comment-19289710</link><description>&lt;p&gt;WTF? After I went to &lt;a href="http://footer.aol.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://footer.aol.com/"&gt;http://footer.aol.com/&lt;/a&gt; and unchecked the "Show the message footer at the bottom of each email you send" box I haven't been able to sign on to AOL. My feeling about this is "BIG F'ing DEAL" I only used aol for junk mail anyway. If aol vanished into thin air I couldn't care any less.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aolisadork</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 05:23:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AOL Settles Suit Regarding Email Footers (Lulz)</title><link>http://www.joemanna.com/blog/aol-settles-suit-regarding-email-footers-lulz/#comment-17137707</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What are the benefits of opting out of this class lawsuit thing? I would love to not have my name affiliated to any lawsuit if I can choose to have or not have the advertising footers at the bottom of the emails anyway. Well I guess I should ask, would my name be associated to this claim? I have no thought of wanting to bring a claim against AOL for this advertising matter, so is it a good idea to "opt-out?" If anyone knows the law, I would appreciate to hear from you. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">erik13</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:25:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AOL Settles Suit Regarding Email Footers (Lulz)</title><link>http://www.joemanna.com/blog/aol-settles-suit-regarding-email-footers-lulz/#comment-16693680</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't know if I got an email about it. I have an AOL account for testing purposes at itcouldntb@aol.com (spam it, please - I don't use it for real email so I don't care) but I haven't checked it for my latest load of spam in a while. I can't believe this went to class action and I really can't believe AOL chose to donate to charity to settle it - how many people has AOL put in the poor house by overcharging and not canceling accounts - considering those figures, the settlement doesn't begin to cover them. Just today I got email from another former user - they've been charging her $20-something dollars every month since she canceled last fall. We're talking over $400 worth of stolen money for an account she called up and canceled just like she was supposed to. I get fed up sometimes reading email after email just like hers year in and year out - the subject matter never changes, just the names. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marahmarie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:47:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AOL Settles Suit Regarding Email Footers (Lulz)</title><link>http://www.joemanna.com/blog/aol-settles-suit-regarding-email-footers-lulz/#comment-16580046</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You have an abandoned account and got an e-mail notification of this?  I still use my account and didn't get an e-mail about it. It's about freaking time AOL did this.  As usual, they don't do anything until they get sued or scolded by regulatory agencies.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brenda</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:15:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AOL Settles Suit Regarding Email Footers (Lulz)</title><link>http://www.joemanna.com/blog/aol-settles-suit-regarding-email-footers-lulz/#comment-16580038</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You have an abandoned account and got an e-mail notification of this?  I still use my account and didn't get an e-mail about it. It's about freaking time AOL did this.  As usual, they don't do anything until they get sued or scolded by regulatory agencies.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brenda</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:15:19 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>